Learning standards: the missing key to L&D effectiveness

All L&D teams want to consistently deliver high quality solutions to their internal customers.  To achieve this, everyone on the team needs to approach the work in a similar way – and that “way” needs to allow them to produce results.  So, they do what most L&D teams do: standardize on an instructional design model, or a procedure of some sort.  This makes complete sense.  If we need consistent quality, having everyone follow the same procedure is a logical move.

ID models to not ensure quality learning

Here’s the problem: most ID models are not learning tools – they’re project management tools.  They prescribe the steps you should follow to get a product out the door – and that’s critical.  But within each step, there are lots of decisions you have to make that will affect whether anyone learns from your solution.  For these decisions, you’re on your own.  The models provide little direction on these things.  So many important decisions are left to the judgement of the people implementing the process.  That’s where the inconsistency and quality problems creep in.

A shared understanding of quality

Instructional design models will help you get to the finish line.  They will not, however, ensure that you get there with the right product.  For that, everyone on the L&D team needs to share the same notion of what quality really means.  They need to know what good looks like.  They need a north star to guide the decisions they make regardless of the procedures they follow.  Ideally, a north star informed by learning science.  This is where learning standards come in.

The benefits of learning standards

Learning standards define what good instruction looks like in clear, observable, measurable ways.  With a strong set of standards, everyone on the L&D team evaluates each moment-to-moment decision against the standard and evaluates their deliverables against them.  Standards strengthen the team’s ability to rationalize their decisions to key stakeholders.  Practiced long enough, L&D team members internalize the standards – they become a reflexive part of daily work.

Furthermore, quality standards add consistency and structure to coaching and feedback.  L&D leaders can use standards in reviews of interim deliverables, project debriefings, and even in performance development conversations.  Quality standards can even play a role in development plans for L&D professionals, helping to pinpoint areas of strength and opportunities for growth.

A force for team alignment

In sum, a good set of quality standards, applied in the right way, can transform an L&D team.  They create a uniform system for getting everyone on the same page and institutionalizing the team’s way of working.  They are an indispensable requirement for establishing an L&D team that consistently delivers results for their internal stakeholders.

Share article

Similar article

Is learning ROI fool’s gold?

Is our current way of thinking about evaluation compatible with how modern organizations operate? If not, then it may be time we recalibrate how we think about it, particularly at levels three and four.

The five mistakes companies make when hiring elearning vendors

Finding the right elearning vendor isn't easy. The features that will most effect success are not always obvious and it can be hard to peer through the sales and marketing veneer. Here are the most common mistakes we see.

Five questions to ask before hiring a learning agency

Finding the right agency requires getting beyond the typical sales pitch and marketing spin. Here are some questions that will help you dig under the hood to get closer to the heart of what matters the most.